1990 Bronco electrical ghost?
This vehicle has a very bad idle condition, someone has replace a lot of things before I got the truck, the PCM, MAP, TPS, ECT, Air temperature sensor, and loose track of the parts, but the funny thing that I was able to see so far was that when I disconnect the TPS or the MAP sensor the RPM stables, only that when I disconnect the MAP sensor the Pulse with increases too, but when I disconnect the TPS the pulse with stays about the same with smooth running condition, but the funny this is the picture Am posting, where the waveform looks smooth, is when I disconnect either the MAP or TPS, and when the waveform looks noisy truck is idling bad, what you guys think?
Im pretty sure you can see the fuel trim on this truck. Do you have a scanner capable of connecting? Any codes?(I dont have an answer for your scope question,Im not so sure it is related,but Im not versed enough in that matter to answer correctly.)
Hi Rudy: No scan tool serial data on this vehicle that far back. Guido
I believe 1992 was when the data came in. However, if there are 5 wires in the data connector, you can lie to the scan tool and enter a later year, data will appear. If it has 4 wires, no data!
Hi Jamey: I thought that it was 1994. Guido
1994 Is when Ford advertised it as a data stream, but as early as 1992 the connector had 5 wires in it. The 5th wire is the data stream. I would tell my old red brick that I was connecting to a 1994, but read data on a 1992 :-)
I guess that I should've held onto that l'il grey cell. Oh well. I'm sure that I had fun losing it. Thanks for the correction, Jamey. Guido
Nothing like old timers . No scan tools with pids . Were do you go??. Gut filling
I've never seen data on any pre-OBD2 Ford. And we have a bunch still here. I wonder if it's on CA emissions only.
I bet most of the Ford’s you see have California emissions. But I don’t think it was California only. Connect to one with your red brick and see, or any other old school scan tool that is pre OBD II. If the dog house connector has 5 wires, it has a data stream.
You would lose that bet. I'm the only one in the shop that writes that down, and I do it on every car I look at. Most of the cars here came here with somebody and got left when they decided not to stay. Almost nobody moves here from Cali. Oregon and Washington are tied for #1. Pretty much any random place else after that. I'll try and remember that fifth wire tip, thanks. Probably be a month…
Pretty cool problem. First thing would be to check the electrical system, bat. Alt.. i would think with the sensors plugged in its causing one or more of those circuits to be pulled down which is affecting the injector or pcm injector control circuit. look at a wiring diagram see whats what. Ck the 5v ref supply and grounds to the TPS and map plugged and unplugged.
You can try adding a ground to the PCM, but that fuzzy signal is usually an internal PCM ground issue. It's not as bad as some, but I have seen that signal before. You will most likely see the fuzz on all your PCM out puts and signals. Here is an injector circuit that I had. This fuzzy signal was on all my outputs.
Had a similar issue, chased my tail a bit, sent in the PCM to get checked out by a rebuilder, they stated that it was OK, chased my tail some more circling around the PCM, ended up replacing the PCM and took care the issues.
I don't much about wave forms I'd like to see what more experienced reform guys think. I'm guessing but I would say bad ground?
Check the main ground wire that has a connection by the rad support. Quite often it is damaged or not hooked up after battery cable repair. Check the AC ripple at the alternator and not at the battery under load. If equipped disconnect the DPFE sensor and see what happens,they would short out and short the reference voltage to ground..
Where is your scope grounded, and is the ground a good clean ground? Have you scoped the voltage ripple from the generator? What is the koeo frequency of the MAP sensor?
Albin is referring to HZ reading of MAP sensor. I agree. Seen them get skewed enough to cause drive-ability concerns but not set a code. Plus this system was just about the most "stupid" of this eras vehicles. EEC systems were tough to diag. They did not output data until around 1994 i believe?
Gail thats is why we used brake out boxes to diag on the early ones
or SBDS pbs.twimg.com/media/CIxn8R7U…
Chris do you remember snap on simu-tech. What a great tool
I was a dealer guy for most of my career. SBDS was a necessary evil. Too many cables, computer problems, finicky touchscreen, but the only way to do it.
I wasn't in Ford dealership back then. And back then when i was looking for a break-out box other people thought it was a waste of money. Just keep replacing parts until it's fixed was their motto. I still think they sucked.
Wonderful guys, I’ll answer some of the questions you guys have after doing more testing, definitely leaning towards a ground issue or PCM.
i was not at dealer either . but i used BOB all the time
During the 80's & early 90's i lived in WV. They barely had running water. Forget about buying diagnostic tools. I bought my own Rotunda BOB after i moved to NC in 1996. Much too late.
Nope. Used paper clips. But reading data on GM & Mopar for years before Ford spoiled me.
Other wise known as t pins . Scaner danner still uses them and sma auto . I donot like them to big
Hi Roberto: I'd be curious what you get for a reference voltage reading (voltage and quality) and sensor ground at the MAP & TPS. If good, I'm inclined to go along with the others on excessive A/C ripple from the alternator or a bad ground. If your VREF is low or noisy, I'd look at a schematic to see what else is shared on the VREF circuit branch/s. Note: there should be more than 1 VREF…
Roberto, I'm having some issues with the site so images won't display full size, but I can see the thumbnail well enough when I right click to a new tab that the pulsing you are seeing is pretty regular. Start scoping other components to see if it is on them as well.
The 2 photos indicate that the noise is on the 12v supply but isn’t actually affecting injector operation. Since unplugging sensors cause the noise to cease, I would look at the source and grounds for the sensors. The patern of the noise doesn’t look like typical alternator noise but the voltage regulator might be suspect. This one is much older but odd noise on the sensor supply caused by the…
Guys, one of the things I forgot to ask was if on this fuel injection sistem, is normal for the computer to turn all the injectors at the same time? Because this truck has two banks one ground for 1-4-5-8 and another ground for 2-3-6-7, is it normal for the computer to open the injectors at the same time, even having two banks? I try to find this information in alldata, mitchell but is no…
Hi Roberto: What is on the VECI label? Guido
NOT SFI but being California emissions I'm not sure what they did. At lower right says MPI. Batch injection.
Hi Gail: And the top says EEC-IV. They're bank fired. Guido
Hi Roberto I will just throw this out there, its more of a silver bullet thing than a test and arrive at a solution. The silver bullet part is, "try adjusting up the minimum airflow idle stop, count the number of turns in case you want to put it back because it doesnt help anything or whatever. Of this vintage I have seen a couple times that adjusting that up seems to clear up some idle…
Ok guys, after installing the original module on this truck this is what happened, the ground signal went back to normal, that means the ground issue was from the computer, the grounds going to module are ok with a minimum noise, customer installed a reman module that had some problems and he assumed that the problem was somewhere else, so he kept replacing parts until he gave up, installing the…
CIP-Customer Induced Problem!! Glad you got it !
Don't you just love it when people just throw parts at a symptom and not even try to find the problem. I'm sure the customer is glad you stayed the course.